Politics in Washington is heavily reliant on give and take. President Joe Biden’s nomination of Adeel Mangi to the United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals has been withdrawn amid controversy and strategic political maneuvering in the Senate. Mangi’s nomination faced withdrawal due to Senate opposition. Chuck Schumer struck a deal with Republicans to confirm other nominees, leaving Mangi’s and others’ confirmations behind.
Nomination Controversies
Due to strong opposition from several Senate Democrats, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer decided not to confirm Adeel Mangi to the Third Circuit Appeals Court. Recognizing their dwindling support, the Democratic leadership chose a compromise with Republicans. This compromise, in essence, gives the incoming Trump administration the opportunity to fill these appellate positions.
Mangi’s opposition grew as a result of his previous board positions with organizations such as the Rutgers Center for Security, Race, and Rights, which were accused of anti-Israel rhetoric. His involvement with the Alliance of Families for Justice drew more serious criticism, as it was perceived to support notorious anti-police figures.
President Biden’s 3rd Circuit nominee, Adeel Mangi is tied to
1. An anti-law enforcement organization, @afjny
2. An anti-Israel think tank, @RUCSRR
3. At least two people who led groups linked to Hamas-tied organizations
President Biden should withdraw this nomination. https://t.co/Ub9erGqrQ5— Senate Judiciary Republicans (@SenJudiciaryGOP) May 1, 2024
The Senate Decision-Making
Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee, led by Lindsey Graham, expressed significant concern about Mangi’s alleged radical ties. Due to a lack of sufficient votes, Schumer agreed to let other judicial nominees proceed rather than risk a failed confirmation bid.
“Mr. Mangi’s affiliation with the Alliance of Families for Justice is deeply concerning. My concern is with respect to the organization that supports individuals who kill police officers.” – Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto (D., Nev.)
Mangi’s association with perceived support for groups that justify Islamic terrorism and celebrate those who kill police officers drew further criticism from law enforcement organizations, most notably the Pennsylvania Fraternal Order of Police. The larger sentiment among Senate Democrats was that Mangi’s confirmation would have clashed with American law enforcement interests and Jewish community sensibilities.
It’s long past time for the Biden Administration to withdraw the nomination of Adeel Mangi. Law enforcement officers across the country have been sounding the alarm on Mr. Mangi’s radical affiliations. I’m glad that members of nation’s largest police union have decided to back…
— Leader McConnell (@LeaderMcConnell) March 28, 2024
Looking Ahead
The nomination of Adeel Mangi and subsequent withdrawal highlight the complexities of courtroom politics, as well as the challenges President Biden faces in appointments. Mangi’s potential to be the first Muslim federal appellate judge is now a historical “what-if.” This situation demonstrates the intensity and partisanship that surrounds judicial nominations in the Senate.
This decision establishes a precedent for future nominations, demonstrating the importance of bipartisan compromise and consensus in sustaining judicial appointments, especially in politically charged environments.
Sources:
